Home Blog Page 46

We will miss you Mr Bhave

Hemant Beniwal
-
8
We will miss you Mr Bhave

In 2009, I wrote an article that never got published. I was working with a mutual fund company at the time and did not have freedom of speech. The article was about C.B. Bhave, Chairman of SEBI, and the decision he had just taken – abolishing entry loads on mutual funds.

That frustration of not being able to express what I believed eventually led me to start this blog and my own financial planning practice. So in a very real sense, Mr. Bhave shaped not just the mutual fund industry – he shaped my career.

I am publishing that 2009 article here, with a 2026 update on what actually happened after his decision.

Quick Answer

C.B. Bhave’s decision to abolish entry loads on mutual funds in 2009 was one of the most consequential regulatory moves in Indian personal finance. It ended the era of commission-driven churning and began the slow shift toward advice-based distribution. Fifteen years later, the industry looks radically different – and almost entirely for the better.

The article I wrote in 2009 – published here for the first time

Written on 2nd July 2009. The views are as they were then.

SEBI took a great decision. “Brave Heart” Mr. Bhave. This will completely change the way financial advice is delivered in future – the industry shifting from commission-based to fee-based advice. This is the healthiest thing that has ever happened to the craft of advice, but it needs a sea change in the way advisors relate to their clients.

In the present system, financial services are delivered through an agency model, not a financial advisory model. Most so-called service providers are product providers. This entire concept was wrong, and this move will rectify the problems associated with this industry.

The equity AUM of the mutual fund industry was Rs.24,000 crore in June 2000. By mid-2009, it was just above Rs.1.4 lakh crore – and had been below Rs.1 lakh crore at the worst of the 2008-09 market fall. If we are not wrong, had the money been left untouched in some good funds, we would have achieved the same AUM or more – because the average return of diversified equity funds from June 2000 was over 18% per annum, with the best funds delivering over 30% per annum.

So what efforts did the industry actually make to grow the market? Because of entry loads and excessive remuneration, money kept churning from one scheme to another. Look at the data from June 2000 to May 2009:

Category Amount (Rs. crore)
NFO Sales 1,19,009
Regular Sales 2,92,708
Total Sales 4,11,717
Redemptions 3,01,532
Net Sales 1,10,185

The investor cost during this period: more than Rs.9,000 crore in entry loads alone (Rs.4.11 lakh crore × 2.25% = Rs.9,264 crore). The industry was not growing the investor base – it was sharing the existing cake through churning.

Mr. Bhave’s decision will bring good business sense. Reduced churning. More focus on SIPs and retail money. More long-term AUM. The insurance industry, where maximum mis-selling happens, will eventually be forced to change too.

“He who rejects change is the architect of decay. The only human institution which rejects progress is the cemetery.” – Harold Wilson

What actually happened – the 2026 update

Fifteen years later, we can see how right Mr. Bhave was. The numbers tell the story:

AUM growth: Mutual fund industry AUM crossed Rs.67 lakh crore in 2024 – nearly 50x the Rs.1.4 lakh crore of 2009. More importantly, this growth came from genuine new investors, not from churning existing money.

SIP revolution: Monthly SIP inflows crossed Rs.25,000 crore in 2024. Active SIP accounts crossed 10 crore. This retail participation through systematic investing was exactly what Mr. Bhave envisioned – long-term money, not hot money.

The RIA framework: SEBI’s 2013 Investment Adviser regulations, which introduced SEBI-registered RIAs as fiduciaries separate from distributors, built on the foundation Bhave laid. The fee-based advisory model he foresaw now has a regulatory structure.

Distributor evolution: The distributors who survived did so by building genuine client relationships rather than relying on churning. The industry did not collapse as many predicted – it flourished by doing the right thing.

The ULIP battle: Mr. Bhave’s famous confrontation with the insurance regulator over ULIPs being sold as investments was another landmark. He was right there too – IRDAI eventually tightened ULIP charges significantly in 2010 and beyond.

What Mr. Bhave meant to me personally

There are few regulators in any country who make decisions that are structurally right but commercially unpopular, and hold firm against intense industry pressure. Mr. Bhave did this repeatedly.

The no-entry-load decision cost him popularity in the distribution community. The ULIP battle made powerful insurance companies his enemies. He did both anyway because he believed the investor deserved a fair deal.

In 25 years of advising families, I have seen what commission-driven mis-selling does to people – the Rs.12 lakh tied up in ULIPs that provide no real insurance, the endowment policies that deliver 4% real returns over 20 years. Mr. Bhave tried to change the structural incentives that created these outcomes. He succeeded more than his critics expected.

Also read: How to Identify a Fake Financial Planner – and the SEBI Checklist Before You Hire Anyone

The shift from commission to advice is still ongoing

Mr. Bhave started a structural reform that is 15 years old and still incomplete. Many investors still work with distributors who earn commissions on every product they recommend. Knowing how your advisor is compensated remains one of the most important questions you can ask.

Explore RetireWise

Frequently asked questions

What was C.B. Bhave’s biggest contribution to Indian mutual funds?

C.B. Bhave, as SEBI Chairman from 2008 to 2011, abolished entry loads on mutual funds in 2009. Until then, investors paid 2 to 2.5% of their investment as upfront commission to distributors whenever they bought a mutual fund. This incentivised churning – switching investors between funds to generate fresh commission – rather than long-term investing. Abolishing entry loads ended this structural conflict of interest and began the shift toward advice-based distribution.

How has the Indian mutual fund industry grown since the no-entry-load decision?

Mutual fund AUM grew from approximately Rs.1.4 lakh crore in 2009 to over Rs.67 lakh crore in 2024 – a nearly 50x increase. Monthly SIP inflows crossed Rs.25,000 crore and active SIP accounts crossed 10 crore. The growth came from genuine retail participation rather than institutional churning. The distribution community adapted and survived, contrary to predictions of industry collapse after the entry load removal.

What is the difference between a mutual fund distributor and a SEBI RIA?

A mutual fund distributor earns trailing commission from AMCs on the assets they manage – typically 0.5 to 1% per year depending on the fund category. A SEBI-registered Investment Adviser (RIA) is a fiduciary who cannot receive commissions and charges fees directly from clients. Both models are legal. The distributor model involves a structural conflict of interest – the distributor earns more when clients stay in higher-commission funds. The RIA model aligns advisor income with client outcomes. C.B. Bhave’s 2009 reform was the first step toward this distinction.

Did Mr. Bhave’s decision affect your investment journey? Were you an investor or a distributor when the entry load was removed? Share what changed for you in the comments.

Nippon India Gold Savings Fund Review 2026: Is a Gold Fund of Fund Worth It?

Hemant Beniwal
-
147
Nippon India Gold Savings Fund Review 2026: Is a Gold Fund of Fund Worth It?

📢 Name Change — Updated April 2026

Reliance Gold Savings Fund is now Nippon India Gold Savings Fund. Reliance Mutual Fund was acquired by Nippon Life India in 2019 and all funds were rebranded. The fund’s structure and objective remain identical. This review has been updated to reflect the current name, updated expense ratios, and the tax changes of Budget 2024.

This article was originally written in February 2011, when Reliance Gold Savings Fund launched. The core argument was straightforward: gold Fund of Funds carry dual expense layers, gold returns are modest over very long periods, and the cost-to-return ratio was unfavourable.

Fifteen years later, gold’s performance in INR has surprised many — including me. Between 2010 and 2025, gold delivered approximately 13-14% CAGR in rupee terms, significantly outperforming the original projection of 6-8%. A significant part of this was INR depreciation against the USD, which flatters rupee gold returns.

But the core structural argument about expenses and role in a portfolio still holds. Let’s examine it with 2026 data.

⚡ Quick Answer

Nippon India Gold Savings Fund is a Fund of Fund that invests in Nippon India Gold ETF, which holds physical gold. It allows gold investment without a demat account, via SIP. The cost vs Gold ETF is marginal (0.1-0.15% extra per year). Gold should be 5-10% of a retirement portfolio — no more. It is a hedge, not a growth engine. If you have a demat account, a Gold ETF is slightly more efficient. If not, this fund works.

What Is Nippon India Gold Savings Fund?

It is a Fund of Fund (FoF) — a mutual fund that invests in another mutual fund, rather than directly in stocks or bonds. Specifically, it invests in Nippon India Gold ETF, which in turn holds physical gold. The chain is: your money → Gold Savings Fund → Gold ETF → physical gold.

The reason this structure exists: Gold ETFs require a demat account to buy and sell. A Gold Savings Fund does not — you invest in it like any other mutual fund via SIP, lump sum, or through your financial advisor. This makes it accessible to investors who don’t have or don’t want to manage a demat account.

Current Expense Structure (2026)

The dual-expense concern raised in 2011 is still valid, though the gap has narrowed. Both the ETF and the FoF have significantly reduced their expense ratios over the years due to SEBI regulation.

As of 2026 (regular plan, approximate): Nippon India Gold ETF expense ratio is approximately 0.79%. The Gold Savings Fund adds approximately 0.12-0.15% on top. Total combined expense of approximately 0.9-1.0% per year in the regular plan.

In the direct plan, combined expenses are lower — around 0.1-0.2% for the ETF and minimal for the FoF layer. For investors going through advisors, the regular plan is appropriate.

💡 Gold FoF vs Gold ETF — The Real Cost Difference in 2026

The additional cost of a Gold FoF over a Gold ETF is now approximately 0.1-0.15% per year in the regular plan — far smaller than the 0.5% gap that existed in 2011. On a Rs. 10 lakh investment over 10 years, this translates to roughly Rs. 15,000-20,000 in additional expense. For investors who don’t have a demat account, this is a reasonable price for the SIP convenience.

Tax Treatment — Updated for Budget 2024

Gold Fund of Funds are treated as non-equity funds for taxation. Budget 2024 made an important change to the holding period for long-term classification:

Short-term capital gains (held under 24 months): Taxed at your income slab rate.

Long-term capital gains (held over 24 months): Taxed at 12.5% without indexation benefit.

The change from 36 months to 24 months for LTCG eligibility is a meaningful improvement — investors now qualify for LTCG treatment two years earlier than before Budget 2024.

⚠️ Verify Tax Treatment Before Investing

Budget 2024 significantly revised the tax treatment of debt and non-equity funds. This article reflects the position as understood in April 2026 — always verify current rates with your advisor before transacting. Gold FoF taxation has been revised multiple times and can change again.

Gold’s Role in a Retirement Portfolio — The Honest View

In 2011, the argument was that gold would deliver 6-8% over the next decade. In rupee terms, it delivered nearly double that. Does that mean the 2011 caution was wrong?

Not entirely. Much of gold’s rupee outperformance came from INR depreciation — the rupee fell from approximately Rs. 45/USD in 2011 to Rs. 83/USD by 2024. A significant portion of rupee gold returns is currency depreciation, not gold price appreciation per se. If you believe the rupee will continue to weaken at the same pace, that argument continues. If not, gold’s future rupee returns may be more modest.

The structural case for gold in a retirement portfolio remains unchanged: it is a hedge against systemic financial stress, currency debasement, and geopolitical risk. It performs poorly in stable, high-growth environments and well in crises. 5-10% of a retirement portfolio in gold — held patiently — provides meaningful downside protection without sacrificing too much long-term return.

What gold is not: a primary retirement accumulation vehicle. A senior executive whose retirement corpus is primarily in gold is taking concentrated commodity risk on an asset with no yield, no dividends, and no cash flows. Equity mutual funds remain the right vehicle for long-horizon retirement accumulation.

Gold vs Other Assets — Approximate INR Returns (2010-2025)

Gold (INR)

~13-14%

Includes INR depreciation

Nifty 50 (INR)

~14-15%

Dividend reinvested, approx.

Bank FD (INR)

~6-7%

Pre-tax, varying rates

Approximate figures. Past returns not indicative of future performance. Always verify with current data.

Gold FoF vs Gold ETF — Which Should You Choose?

Choose Gold ETF if: You have a demat account and are comfortable buying ETFs. You want the absolute minimum expense ratio. You invest in larger amounts (lump sum rather than small SIPs).

Choose Gold Savings Fund if: You don’t have or don’t want a demat account. You want to invest via SIP in small monthly amounts. You want the same buy/sell convenience as any mutual fund investment through your advisor.

The cost difference is now marginal. The right choice is the one you will actually execute and hold. For most retail investors investing through advisors, the Gold Savings Fund is perfectly adequate.

Wondering how much gold (if any) belongs in your retirement portfolio?

The right allocation depends on your overall portfolio, existing assets, and retirement timeline. 30 minutes is all it takes to get clarity.

Talk to a RetireWise Advisor

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened to Reliance Gold Savings Fund?

Reliance Mutual Fund was acquired by Nippon Life India in 2019 and rebranded as Nippon India Mutual Fund. Reliance Gold Savings Fund is now Nippon India Gold Savings Fund. The fund’s structure, objective, and underlying ETF linkage remain unchanged.

Should I invest in a gold fund of fund or a Gold ETF?

If you have a demat account, a Gold ETF is marginally more cost-efficient. If not, a Gold Savings Fund offers identical economic exposure with SIP convenience. The additional cost of the FoF layer is approximately 0.1-0.15% per year in 2026 — modest enough that the right choice is whichever format you will actually invest in and hold consistently.

How is gold fund of fund taxed in India?

Post Budget 2024: short-term gains (under 24 months) at slab rate; long-term gains (over 24 months) at 12.5% without indexation. The holding period for LTCG eligibility was reduced from 36 months to 24 months — an improvement for investors. Verify current rates with your advisor before investing.

What percentage of my retirement portfolio should be in gold?

5-10% is the generally recommended range — enough to provide meaningful portfolio protection in crises, not so much that commodity volatility dominates your retirement outcomes. Gold is a hedge and a store of value, not a primary wealth-building vehicle. The core of a retirement portfolio remains equity mutual funds and fixed income.

Gold has no dividends. No earnings. No management team improving its output year on year. What it has is 5,000 years of human trust, and an uncanny ability to hold value when everything else is falling apart.

Keep it small. Keep it steady. Don’t make it the plan.

💬 Your Turn

Do you hold gold in your portfolio — through a fund, ETF, or physical? What percentage of your total assets is it? Share below. The most common finding: most investors are either at 0% (ignoring gold entirely) or 20%+ (over-concentrated from legacy physical gold).

Mutual Fund SIP: The Only Honest Guide You Need to Start (2026)

Hemant Beniwal
-
423
Mutual Fund SIP: The Only Honest Guide You Need to Start (2026)

This article was first written in February 2011. At that time, asking someone in a Mumbai office about SIP was met with blank stares.

Fifteen years later, a colleague tracked down one of our readers — someone who had read this very article, started a Rs. 3,000 monthly SIP the same month, and never stopped. His corpus today: over Rs. 35 lakh. He didn’t pick the best fund. He didn’t time the market. He just didn’t stop.

That story is both the best advertisement for SIP — and the most honest summary of how it actually works.

⚡ Quick Answer

A SIP (Systematic Investment Plan) means investing a fixed amount every month in a mutual fund — automatically. You can start with as little as Rs. 250. The real power isn’t the SIP itself — it’s the discipline to keep going when markets fall. This guide covers what SIP actually is, how to start, what to look for in funds, and the one behaviour that wipes out most SIP gains.

The Compounding Power of SIP

Rs. 10,000/month @ 12% annual return

After 10 Years

₹23L

Invested: ₹12L

After 20 Years

₹1 Cr

Invested: ₹24L

After 30 Years

₹3.5 Cr

Invested: ₹36L

Illustrative only. Assumes 12% p.a. Actual returns vary and are not guaranteed.

What is SIP in Mutual Fund?

A Systematic Investment Plan is a method of investing, not a product. You commit a fixed amount every month — say Rs. 5,000 — and it moves automatically from your bank account into a mutual fund scheme on a set date. The fund house allots you units at the prevailing NAV that day.

Think of it like a recurring deposit — except instead of earning fixed interest, your money buys units of a mutual fund that can grow at higher rates over long periods. Some months you buy at a higher NAV. Some months lower. Over time, this averages out — a principle called rupee-cost averaging.

You can start with as little as Rs. 250 per month under SEBI’s micro-SIP initiative, though Rs. 500 remains the standard minimum across most fund houses. There’s no upper limit. You can run multiple SIPs across different fund schemes simultaneously.

The 7 Real Benefits of SIP

1. It fits how most Indians earn.
Salary arrives monthly. Expenses happen monthly. SIP aligns investments with that rhythm. You invest before you spend, automatically. Wealth-building stops being a decision and becomes a default.

2. It removes market timing from the equation.
Nobody can consistently predict market highs and lows — not even fund managers. SIP sidesteps this entirely. Every month you invest, regardless of whether the Sensex is at 85,000 or 65,000. This isn’t a consolation prize. It’s a genuine structural advantage over lump sum investing for salaried people.

3. Rupee-cost averaging lowers your effective buy price.
When markets fall, your fixed SIP amount buys more units. When markets rise, fewer. Over a decade, your average cost per unit tends to be lower than the average NAV over the same period. More practically: you stop dreading market crashes, because crashes mean you’re buying more.

4. Compounding rewards early starters disproportionately.
Someone who invests Rs. 10,000 per month from age 25 to 60 at 12% accumulates significantly more than someone who starts at 35 with the same amount. Time is the one variable in compounding you cannot buy back.

5. It enforces discipline you can’t enforce yourself.
When markets fall 25%, every instinct says stop. The SIP mandate removes that choice. The money leaves your account before you can second-guess it. In 25 years of advising, the biggest driver of wealth I’ve seen isn’t fund selection. It’s consistency through bad months.

6. Easy to start, pause, or stop.
Unlike PPF or ELSS (with lock-in periods), most equity SIPs can be paused or stopped at any time. The invested units stay in your account. This makes SIP compatible with real life — career changes, emergencies, goal modifications.

7. Tax efficiency.
Long-term capital gains on equity funds above Rs. 1.25 lakh per year are taxed at 12.5%. Short-term gains at 20%. ELSS SIPs additionally provide Section 80C deduction of up to Rs. 1.5 lakh per year on invested amounts. And from 2026, new SEBI regulations have lowered fund expense ratios — meaning more of your return stays with you.

💡 The Honest Caveat

SIP does not protect you from poor fund selection or from redeeming at the wrong time. An excellent SIP discipline in a consistently underperforming fund will produce mediocre results. And the most common way people destroy their SIP returns is by stopping during a market crash — exactly when continued investment would help them most.

How to Start a SIP in Mutual Fund (Step by Step)

Step 1: Complete your KYC.
One-time process. Do it online through any AMFI-registered platform using Aadhaar and PAN. Takes 15-20 minutes.

Step 2: Choose direct or regular plan.
Direct plans are available through each fund house’s website or MFCentral. They have lower expense ratios — meaningfully so over a 20-year SIP. Regular plans through distributors aren’t free — you pay the commission in a slightly higher expense ratio every year.

Step 3: Pick your fund and amount.
Start with a realistic amount you can sustain through salary cuts and market crashes. Rs. 5,000 that runs for 20 years beats Rs. 20,000 that gets stopped in Year 3.

Step 4: Set the auto-debit mandate.
Your bank deducts the SIP amount on your chosen date — 1st, 5th, 10th, 15th, or 25th of the month. The mandate activates within 30 days of setup.

Step 5: Don’t touch it.
Review once a year. Not once a week.

What Kind of Funds to Consider for SIP in 2026

I won’t rank funds. The fund that led in 2020 may lag in 2025. Past performance matters, but consistency across market cycles — including crashes — matters more than peak CAGR.

For a 10-20 year retirement horizon: 2-3 diversified equity funds is enough. One large-cap or Flexi-cap fund, one mid-cap fund, and optionally one small-cap if you can hold steady when it drops 40%. More than 4-5 funds in overlapping categories is over-diversification — you pay multiple expense ratios for essentially one portfolio.

For a 5-7 year goal: Mix equity and hybrid funds. Pure equity SIPs over less than 5 years carry real principal-loss risk if markets are down at redemption time.

For tax saving: ELSS funds give Section 80C deduction with a 3-year lock-in per SIP installment. Over a long horizon, returns tend to exceed PPF while also providing tax benefit.

Use Value Research or Morningstar ratings as a starting filter, not a final answer. Look for funds with consistent 5-year and 10-year track records — especially how they performed in 2020 and 2022 market falls.

The Compounding Reality — What the Numbers Actually Show

Monthly SIP 10 Years @12% 20 Years @12% 30 Years @12%
Rs. 5,000 Rs. 11.6 lakh Rs. 49.9 lakh Rs. 1.76 crore
Rs. 10,000 Rs. 23.2 lakh Rs. 99.9 lakh Rs. 3.53 crore
Rs. 20,000 Rs. 46.4 lakh Rs. 1.99 crore Rs. 7.05 crore
Rs. 50,000 Rs. 1.16 crore Rs. 4.99 crore Rs. 17.6 crore

Illustrative only. Assumes 12% annual return. Actual returns vary and are not guaranteed.

Notice the jump from 20 years to 30 years. That’s not linear — it’s exponential. The last 10 years of a 30-year SIP generate more wealth than the first 20. This is why stopping a SIP at year 15 “to take a break” is so expensive. You’re stopping just as the compounding curve starts to steepen.

The One Mistake That Wipes Out Most SIP Gains

Here’s what nobody puts in the brochure.

The Sensex fell 38% between January and March 2020. In the months that followed, SIP cancellations at major fund houses hit multi-year highs. Those investors locked in their losses and missed the recovery. By December 2020, the Sensex had fully recovered and gone higher. The investors who kept their SIPs running through March 2020 were buying units at 38% discount. They benefited from both the crash and the recovery.

The investors who stopped didn’t get either.

It’s not a Numbers Game. It’s a Mind Game.

Your SIP’s biggest enemy is not a bad fund manager or a weak economy. It’s the 11 PM conversation you have with yourself when your portfolio is down 25% and the financial news channel is running disaster headlines. The discipline to do nothing in those moments is worth more than any fund selection decision you’ll ever make.

Building toward retirement through SIPs?

Starting a SIP is easy. Knowing how much to invest, in what categories, and for how long — linked to your actual retirement date — that’s the work worth doing with an advisor.

Talk to a RetireWise Advisor

Frequently Asked Questions

What is SIP in mutual fund?

A Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) is a method of investing a fixed amount in a mutual fund at regular intervals — typically monthly. It builds wealth gradually without requiring a lump sum, and benefits from rupee-cost averaging over time.

What is the minimum amount to start a SIP?

Most fund houses allow SIPs from Rs. 500 per month. SEBI’s micro-SIP initiative has brought this down to Rs. 250 per month in participating schemes. There is no maximum limit.

Can I stop a SIP anytime?

Yes — except ELSS funds, which have a 3-year lock-in per installment. For all other equity funds, you can pause or stop anytime. The invested units remain in your folio. But stopping during a market downturn is the most expensive mistake most investors make.

Is SIP better than lump sum investment?

For salaried investors with monthly income, SIP is the natural fit — it aligns investments with income. For a lump sum, consider a Systematic Transfer Plan (STP) from a liquid fund, which moves money gradually into equity rather than investing all at once at potentially the wrong time.

How long should I continue a SIP?

The longer the better — especially for retirement goals. 5 years is the minimum for equity SIPs to behave as intended. 10-20+ years is where the compounding curve starts to steepen dramatically. Stopping at Year 15 of a 30-year plan is like leaving a cricket match at the 40th over when you’re set for a big total.

The first SIP reader who stayed invested for 15 years from this article’s original publication date likely has more wealth today than someone who spent those same years searching for the “best” fund.

Do the Right Thing and Sit Tight.

💬 Your Turn

Have you ever stopped a SIP during a market crash — and later wished you hadn’t? Or did you keep going? Tell us below. With 423 comments on this article over 15 years, the most useful answers are usually from real investors, not advisors.

Ask Readers: How to Save Maximum Tax

Hemant Beniwal
-
13
Ask Readers: How to Save Maximum Tax

A reader named Srinivas wrote to me in 2011 with what I called a dream question. He had already figured out the basic tax-saving framework on his own and asked: “Is there anything beyond 80C, mediclaim, infrastructure bonds, and home loan interest?”

He was right then. The fundamental challenge of Indian tax planning has not changed: there are surprisingly few legitimate ways to reduce taxable income, and most of them are already well-known.

What has changed dramatically since 2011 is the framework itself. The new tax regime, introduced as default from FY2023-24, has made most of Srinivas’s question irrelevant for a large portion of taxpayers. Infrastructure bonds (80CCF) he mentioned no longer exist. The mediclaim limit was Rs.15,000 then – it is Rs.25,000 to Rs.50,000 now.

So here is the 2026 answer to Srinivas’s question – updated for the world as it actually is.

⚠️ Important update

The original post mentioned Section 80CCF infrastructure bonds (Rs.20,000 deduction) and mediclaim at Rs.15,000. Both are outdated. 80CCF bonds were discontinued after 2012. Mediclaim limits are now Rs.25,000/Rs.50,000. More importantly, the new tax regime (now the default) makes most of these deductions irrelevant unless you have explicitly opted for the old regime.

Quick Answer

Step 1: Determine your regime. Under the new regime (now default), most deductions including 80C do not apply. Under the old regime, the maximum legitimate tax-saving framework for a salaried individual in 2026 is: 80C (Rs.1.5L) + 80CCD(1B) NPS (Rs.50K) + 80D mediclaim (up to Rs.1L) + home loan interest 24(b) (Rs.2L) + HRA. Beyond this, the options are genuinely limited – and that is the honest answer.

First: which regime are you in?

This is the question Srinivas could not have faced in 2011 – it did not exist. From FY2023-24, the new tax regime became the default. If you have not explicitly opted out, you are in it.

Under the new regime: Lower slab rates, standard deduction of Rs.75,000, employer NPS contribution (80CCD(2)) – and essentially nothing else. The ELSS, PPF, insurance premiums, home loan interest, HRA – none of it applies. Tax planning in the traditional sense is largely irrelevant.

Under the old regime: Higher slab rates but all the deductions remain available. If your total deductions exceed approximately Rs.3.75 lakh, the old regime typically saves more tax. Below that, the new regime is usually better.

Determine this first. Everything else in this article applies only if you are on the old regime.

The maximum deduction framework – old regime, FY2025-26

Section 80C – Rs.1.5 lakh (the anchor)

The 80C limit has been Rs.1.5 lakh since 2014 and was not changed in Budget 2025. It includes EPF, PPF, ELSS, life insurance premiums, home loan principal, NSC, tuition fees, and Sukanya Samriddhi.

Most salaried employees already partially fill this through EPF. Check your Form 16 before investing more. If your EPF contribution is Rs.1.2 lakh, you need only Rs.30,000 more.

Best choices within 80C: ELSS (shortest lock-in, equity returns), PPF (safe, tax-free), NPS Tier 1 (pension corpus, but lock-in till 60).

Section 80CCD(1B) – additional Rs.50,000 for NPS

This is the one deduction that goes beyond the 80C limit. Contributions to NPS Tier 1 up to Rs.50,000 per year qualify for an additional deduction over and above 80C. If you are already maximising 80C and want to reduce tax further, this is the next logical step.

Note: NPS has a lock-in until age 60 and mandates 40% annuitisation at maturity. Factor this into your liquidity planning before contributing beyond EPF and PPF.

Section 80D – health insurance premiums (up to Rs.1 lakh)

Rs.25,000 for self, spouse, and children (Rs.50,000 if you are 60+). Additional Rs.25,000 for parents (Rs.50,000 if parents are senior citizens). Maximum combined: Rs.1 lakh.

This is money you should be spending on health insurance anyway. It is the most cost-effective deduction available – the insurance you need plus a tax benefit.

Section 24(b) – home loan interest (Rs.2 lakh)

Deduction up to Rs.2 lakh per year on interest paid on a home loan for a self-occupied property. For rented-out properties, the full interest is deductible – but set-off against other income is capped at Rs.2 lakh; the balance carries forward.

HRA – House Rent Allowance

If you receive HRA and pay rent, the exemption is the least of: actual HRA received, 50% of basic salary (in metro cities) or 40% (non-metro), or actual rent paid minus 10% of basic salary. This does not appear in 80C but is a significant tax saving for those paying rent.

80CCD(2) – employer NPS contribution (both regimes)

If your employer contributes to your NPS, up to 10% of basic salary (14% for central government employees) is deductible. This is available in both old and new regimes – the only meaningful deduction that crosses over. If your employer offers voluntary NPS enrollment, this is worth considering regardless of which regime you are in.

Beyond 80C – the honest answer to Srinivas’s question

Srinivas asked in 2011 whether there was anything beyond the standard framework. The honest answer then was: not much for a salaried employee. The honest answer in 2026 is the same.

Section 80G (charitable donations) works if you genuinely want to donate to SEBI/RBI registered charitable organisations – not as a pure tax play. HUF (Hindu Undivided Family) creation can split income between family members but has legal and administrative complexity that makes sense only in specific high-income situations. Gifts to major children can shift investment income but require genuine transfer and typically have a 5 to 7 year horizon before the benefit is meaningful.

The Direct Tax Code that Srinivas referenced in 2011 as a potential game-changer was eventually abandoned and replaced with the new tax regime in a different form. The hope that new instruments would emerge beyond 80C has not materialised in 15 years.

The best tax strategy for most salaried professionals in 2026 is not complex: calculate your regime, maximise whichever deductions apply, and accept that the Indian tax code gives salaried employees a limited toolkit. The real wealth creation happens through investing well – not through finding exotic deductions.

Also read: Simple Tax Planning Guide – Updated for FY2025-26

Tax planning is a small part of financial planning

The maximum tax saving from fully optimising the old regime for a Rs.30 lakh income is approximately Rs.1.5 to 2 lakh per year. The difference between investing Rs.50,000 per month in FDs vs equity funds over 20 years is approximately Rs.10 crore. Spend your energy proportionally.

Book a Clarity Call

Frequently asked questions

What is the maximum tax deduction a salaried person can claim in India in FY2025-26?

Under the old regime, the theoretical maximum for a salaried individual with a home loan, health insurance for self and senior citizen parents, and full NPS contribution is approximately: 80C Rs.1.5L + 80CCD(1B) Rs.50K + 80D Rs.1L + home loan interest Rs.2L + standard deduction Rs.50K = Rs.5.5 lakh, plus HRA if applicable. In practice, most people cannot maximise all of these simultaneously. Under the new regime, only standard deduction (Rs.75K) and employer NPS contribution under 80CCD(2) are available.

Is Section 80CCF infrastructure bond deduction still available?

No. Section 80CCF, which allowed an additional Rs.20,000 deduction for infrastructure bonds, was available only for FY2010-11 and FY2011-12. It was discontinued after that. No new infrastructure bonds under this section have been issued since 2012. If anyone is recommending 80CCF investments in 2026, they are working from a 15-year-old framework that no longer exists.

Can I create an HUF to save tax in India?

Yes, creating a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) can allow income splitting between the HUF and individual, potentially reducing overall family tax liability. However, HUF creation has legal requirements, administrative complexity, and is most beneficial when there is genuine ancestral property or business income to route through it. For most salaried professionals with only employment income, the practical tax benefit of HUF creation is limited. Consult a CA who specialises in HUF structures before proceeding.

What is the NPS tax benefit under Section 80CCD(1B)?

Section 80CCD(1B) allows an additional deduction of Rs.50,000 per year for contributions to NPS Tier 1, over and above the Rs.1.5 lakh limit under 80C. This is available only under the old tax regime. At the 30% tax bracket, this Rs.50,000 deduction saves Rs.15,000 in tax plus applicable surcharge and cess. The trade-off is NPS lock-in until age 60 and mandatory 40% annuitisation at maturity – factor this into your liquidity needs before contributing.

Are you on the old or new tax regime? Have you calculated which one actually saves you more tax for your specific situation? Share in the comments – or share a question like Srinivas did and we can build a useful discussion.

The “Double Your Money” Trap: How Fraud Schemes Work (And Why Smart People Still Fall for Them)

Hemant Beniwal
-
10
The “Double Your Money” Trap: How Fraud Schemes Work (And Why Smart People Still Fall for Them)

“A fool and his money are soon parted. But a clever man and his money can be parted too – if the scheme is designed well enough.” – Anonymous

Over 25 years of practice, I have seen educated, senior professionals fall for investment fraud. A doctor. An engineer. A retired government officer. A software architect at a large IT company. None of them were stupid. None of them were greedy in an obvious way. All of them lost real money to schemes that, in retrospect, had every red flag in the book.

The double-your-money fraud is not a 2011 problem. It is not a rural-only problem. It is not a problem that only affects the unsophisticated. It is a structural human psychology problem – and it recurs, in different packaging, every market cycle.

⚡ Quick Answer

Fraudulent investment schemes – whether Ponzi schemes, chit fund frauds, or “guaranteed high return” deposit schemes – share a consistent anatomy: a professional-looking office, social proof through community networks, promised returns that are 2-3x market rates, and a 1-2 year operating cycle before collapse. The six warning signs that identify every such scheme are covered below. If you see three or more, walk away regardless of who introduced you.

Double your money scam - how investment fraud schemes work in India

The Anatomy of Every “Double Your Money” Scheme

The mechanics of these frauds have not changed in decades. The packaging changes – from chit funds in the 1980s to plantation schemes in the 1990s to cryptocurrency frauds in the 2020s – but the underlying structure is identical. Understanding it once protects you forever.

Step 1 – The legitimate-looking setup. The scheme operator establishes a visible presence: a proper office in a known location, branded letterheads, a registration under some act (often a micro-finance or NBFC registration that sounds authoritative but provides minimal oversight). The goal is to pass a cursory investigation by a semi-suspicious investor.

Step 2 – Recruitment through trusted networks. Agents are recruited from specific communities, neighbourhoods, or professional networks. They are chosen because they are trusted by the target investors – same caste, same locality, same former employer. The pitch comes from someone you know, not a stranger. This is deliberate. Your guard drops when someone you trust introduces an opportunity.

Step 3 – The promised return. Returns are always 2-3x what conventional instruments offer. In a market where FDs pay 6-7%, these schemes promise 15-24% or “doubling in 3 years.” The promises are vague about the mechanism – “we invest in construction,” “we have a proprietary trading system,” “we generate returns from commodities.” The vagueness is the point. Specific disclosures would invite specific scrutiny.

Step 4 – Early payouts build confidence. In the first year, the scheme pays its early investors on time – sometimes ahead of schedule. Word spreads. The early investors become unintentional advocates. “I got my money back plus interest, it is legitimate.” These payouts come from new investor funds, not from any actual business returns. This is the Ponzi structure.

Step 5 – Scaling before the exit. Once credibility is established, recruitment intensifies. Bigger deposit amounts are solicited. The operator is now focused on maximizing collections before the inevitable collapse.

Step 6 – Collapse and disappearance. When maturity dates arrive in large numbers, the scheme cannot pay. Offices close. Key personnel become unreachable. PDCs bounce. By the time investors organize, file police complaints, and get media attention, the operator has moved to a different city or jurisdiction.

Fraud works because trust is not the same as verification.

A SEBI-registered investment adviser is legally accountable, audited, and required to act in your interest. RetireWise is SEBI registered (INA100001927). The person who introduced you to a “great scheme” is not.

See How RetireWise Protects Your Investments

Six Warning Signs That Identify Every Such Scheme

1. Returns significantly above market rates with no clear explanation of how. In 2026, high-quality corporate FDs pay 7-8%. SCSS pays 8.2%. Quality equity mutual funds have generated 12-14% CAGR over long periods with full market risk. Any instrument promising 15-24% with “safety” or “guarantees” is either lying about the returns, lying about the safety, or both.

2. The introduction comes through social or community channels, not formal channels. A colleague, a relative, a community elder – someone you trust – introduces the opportunity. The trust you have in that person is being borrowed to create trust in the scheme. The person who introduced you is almost certainly a genuine believer who has received early payouts. Their belief is real. Their confidence is misplaced.

3. Vague or implausible business model. Ask how the returns are generated. If the answer is vague (“we invest in multiple businesses”), circular (“our model generates these returns”), or sounds implausible (“arbitrage between commodity markets”), it cannot withstand scrutiny. Legitimate investment products have specific, auditable explanations for their return potential.

4. Pressure to decide quickly. “This tranche closes on Friday.” “Only a few spots left.” “Your neighbour has already invested Rs 5 lakh.” Urgency is manufactured. It prevents you from taking the time to verify. Legitimate investment opportunities do not expire in 48 hours.

5. No SEBI registration or verifiable regulatory oversight. Any entity collecting money for investment purposes in India must be registered with SEBI, RBI, or IRDAI depending on the product type. Ask for the registration number and verify it on the SEBI website before giving a single rupee. A “registered under the microfinance act” or “registered with the registrar of companies” is not the same as being a regulated investment entity.

6. Cash preferred or difficult-to-trace payment methods. Legitimate investments can be made through normal banking channels with proper receipts and clear documentation. If an operator prefers cash, asks for transfers to personal accounts, or provides vague receipts, it is a strong signal that they want to limit the paper trail.

Why Smart People Fall For These

I have seen it happen enough times to understand the psychology. It is not stupidity or greed in isolation. It is a combination of social proof (everyone around you is investing), authority bias (the operator has a professional setup and registration documents), and loss aversion in reverse (the fear of missing out on a good opportunity that others are benefiting from).

The most dangerous moment is after the first early payout. At that point, the rational skepticism that might have prevented the initial investment is replaced by lived confirmation. “I invested Rs 1 lakh, got Rs 12,000 interest in 6 months, the scheme is real.” The early payout is specifically designed to produce this effect.

In almost every fraud case I have encountered, the investor who lost the most was not the first investor. It was the investor who received early payouts, became convinced, and then put in a much larger amount in the second or third round.

What To Do If Someone Approaches You

Two simple rules that have never failed: first, verify the SEBI registration number at sebi.gov.in before investing a single rupee – not after, not while “thinking about it,” but before. Second, consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser (not the person who introduced you, not your bank relationship manager, but someone whose regulatory obligation is to advise you correctly) before making any investment outside of known, regulated products.

If you have already invested and are worried, do not invest more to “average out.” That is the most common trap – doubling down to recover earlier losses. File a complaint with SEBI (scores.sebi.gov.in) and your local police economic offences wing immediately, regardless of how unlikely recovery seems.

Read: 7 Financial Planning Mistakes That Are Costing You Retirement Security

The money lost in investment fraud is rarely recovered. The police catch some operators. The investors almost never get their money back. The only protection is not investing in the first place.

If it sounds too good to be true, it is. Every single time.

The best protection against fraud is a financial plan you understand and trust.

When you have a clear retirement plan with known instruments and expected returns, you have a reference point against which any “opportunity” can be immediately evaluated.

Book a Free 30-Min Call

Your Turn

Have you or someone you know been approached by a scheme with unusually high promised returns? What made it seem credible at the time? Sharing these real experiences helps other readers recognise the same patterns before they make a costly mistake.

Story of a Life Insurance Advisor in India — Two Perspectives, One Broken System

Hemant Beniwal
-
47
Story of a Life Insurance Advisor in India — Two Perspectives, One Broken System

Years ago, I received a comment on one of our insurance articles from an insurance advisor based in Delhi. While I was writing my reply, another comment arrived — from a reader in Bangalore who had just been duped by an agent.

Both perspectives were completely different. But they had one thing in common: both were in deep pain.

That was in 2011. I have been thinking about this for 15 years. And in 2026, I finally have the clarity — and the conviction — to say what I believe.

⚡ Quick Answer

The life insurance industry in India has a structural problem: agents earn high upfront commissions (10-35% in year 1), which incentivizes selling expensive products over suitable ones. Honest advisors exist — but the system punishes them. IRDAI is moving toward trail-based commissions (like mutual funds), and the Insurance Fraud Monitoring Framework 2025 takes effect in April 2026. The real solution for consumers: separate insurance (term plan) from investment (mutual funds), and consider a SEBI-registered fee-only advisor who earns zero commission.

The Pain of the Insurance Advisor

Here is what Dhawal (name changed), an insurance advisor from Delhi, wrote to me. I am preserving his words — raw and unedited — because they deserve to be heard:

“Hemant, I have been in this line for 4 years now. Whenever I sit with a client, the first thing they DO NOT WANT is a term plan. To them, this concept is FOOLISH. They want plans that give returns at maturity — in 3 to 5 years. Nobody is ready to look into the distant future.”

“I meet 100 people a month. 17-18 are convinced to proceed. Finally, 4-5 convert into policies. For these 4-5 cases, I am on the phone half the day — working Saturdays, Sundays, holidays — travelling across NCR by car, bike, metro. I get 10-20% commission upfront and not more than 3% on renewals.”

“And the client treats me like a servant — ‘Bhai Saab, POLICY nahi aayi? Mere phone number galat chhapa hai!’ After a year, calling me to pick up renewal premiums, asking me to check portfolios of other companies I do not even represent.”

“The only thing I ask — please differentiate between an AGENT and a FINANCIAL ADVISOR. If your neighbourhood agent is a part-timer who brings his sales manager to every meeting, or passes on 30% of his commission to close the deal — he is an AGENT. Avoid him. But if the first thing he advises is a term plan, has been working full-time for years, has a genuine client base — he is an ADVISOR. Trust him.”

The Pain of the Indian Consumer

Around the same time, Shinoj (name changed), a reader from Bangalore, shared this experience:

“A LIC agent told me that LIC has launched a new ‘attractive’ plan called Retire and Enjoy. I searched — LIC’s website did not even mention it. But agents across India were advertising it.”

“Then I discovered the truth: it was not an official LIC product. It was a combo plan created by agents — stacking multiple LIC policies starting in consecutive years. Why? Because each new policy pays first-year commission. The whole thing was designed to maximise agent income, not customer benefit.”

“My questions: Who is behind this all-India spread? Does LIC have a role in this?”

Both Are Right. And That Is the Problem.

In 2011, I wrote: “Let readers decide what is wrong and what is right — end of the day it is their financial life.”

I was being diplomatic. I should not have been.

Here is what 25 years of practice has taught me:

Dhawal is right. Most honest insurance advisors work incredibly hard for modest income. The public does not understand term plans. Clients treat advisors like errand boys. The 4-5 conversions out of 100 meetings is real — the rejection rate is brutal.

Shinoj is right. The commission structure creates perverse incentives. When the agent earns 30-35% in year 1 for selling a traditional plan but only 10-15% for a term plan, which one will most agents push? The system does not just enable mis-selling — it rewards it.

The problem is not bad agents. It is a broken system.

What Has Changed Since 2011

Then (2011) Now (2026)
High upfront commissions (30-40% year 1) IRDAI actively moving toward trail-based (levelled) commissions like mutual funds
No fee-only advisory option SEBI-registered investment advisors (fee-only, zero commission) now available
Limited consumer awareness Online term plans, comparison platforms, social media education
Minimal fraud enforcement IRDAI Insurance Fraud Monitoring Framework 2025 (effective April 2026)
Agent-created combo plans rampant Still exist — but easier to verify on insurer websites
IRDA IRDAI (renamed 2014), Bima Bharosa complaint portal launched

The trail commission model — if IRDAI implements it — would be the single biggest reform in insurance distribution. Instead of earning 35% in year 1 and almost nothing after, the advisor would earn a steady 5-8% every year the policy stays active. This aligns the advisor’s interest with the customer’s: the advisor makes more money when the customer keeps the policy, not just when they buy it.

What Should You Do as a Consumer?

Step 1: Separate insurance from investment. Buy a term plan for insurance. Buy mutual funds for investment. Never mix them. This single rule would eliminate 80% of insurance mis-selling.

Step 2: If an agent pitches a plan you have never heard of — especially a “combo” plan — verify it on the insurer’s official website. If it is not listed, it is agent-created.

Step 3: Ask the agent what commission they earn on the plan they are recommending. An honest advisor will tell you. A salesperson will get offended.

Step 4: Consider a fee-only advisor. A SEBI-registered investment advisor charges a fee — but earns zero commission from any product. Their advice is unbiased by definition.

Step 5: If you have been mis-sold a policy, file a complaint on the IRDAI’s Bima Bharosa portal. You can also approach the Insurance Ombudsman.

Tired of being sold products instead of given advice?

A fee-only advisor works for you — not the insurance company. No commissions, no product-pushing, no hidden incentives.

Talk to a SEBI-Registered Advisor

Dhawal was not the villain. Shinoj was not naive. They were both trapped in a system that rewards the wrong behaviour. The day India moves to trail commissions and fee-only advisory, both the advisor and the consumer will finally be on the same side.

The right advisor does not sell you a policy. They sell you peace of mind — and that should be worth paying for directly.

💬 Your Turn

Are you an insurance advisor frustrated by the system? Or a consumer who has been burned by mis-selling? Share your story — both perspectives matter. The more we talk about this, the faster the system changes.

This post was originally inspired by reader stories shared by an insurance advisor from Delhi and a consumer from Bangalore. Names have been changed. Their words — lightly edited for clarity — remain their own.

Hidden Charges in Buying or Selling a House: The Complete 2026 Guide

Hemant Beniwal
-
13
Hidden Charges in Buying or Selling a House: The Complete 2026 Guide

“The true cost of a house is never the price on the agreement.” – Every property lawyer, eventually

A client called me in a mild panic some years ago. He had sold his flat in Jaipur for Rs 85 lakh and was buying a new one for Rs 1.1 crore. He had carefully arranged Rs 25 lakh as the difference plus some buffer for registration. Then the bills started arriving.

Stamp duty. Society transfer charges. Broker commission on both ends. Foreclosure fee on the old home loan. Pre-painting the old flat before handing over. Processing fee on the new loan. Parking charges at the new building. Moving expenses. New curtains and a dining table because the old ones did not fit. By the time he was settled, he had spent Rs 11-12 lakh more than his calculation.

This story is not unusual. Property transactions in India carry a layer of costs that buyers and sellers systematically underestimate. Knowing what to expect prevents both cash flow crises and unrealistic planning.

⚡ Quick Answer

The total cost of buying or selling a house in India is typically 8-12% above the stated transaction price. A Rs 1 crore property purchase involves approximately Rs 8-12 lakh in additional costs: stamp duty, registration, broker fees, legal fees, processing charges, and shifting expenses. Planning for these charges upfront prevents the cash shortfall that commonly disrupts property transactions.

Hidden charges when buying or selling property in India - complete guide 2026

When Selling: The Costs on the Seller’s Side

Capital gains tax (2026 update). Budget 2024 made a significant change: long-term capital gains on property is now taxed at 12.5% without indexation. The holding period for long-term classification was reduced from 36 months to 24 months.

If you sell a property held for more than 24 months, your gain (sale price minus purchase price) is taxed at 12.5%. For properties purchased before July 23, 2024, a grandfathering option may allow you to compare the old calculation (20% with indexation) versus the new one (12.5% without indexation) and choose the lower tax. Properties purchased after July 23, 2024 are mandatorily taxed at 12.5% without indexation. Consult your tax planner for the specific calculation on your property.

Capital gains exemption: if you reinvest the gain in another residential property within 2 years of sale (or construct within 3 years), you can claim exemption under Section 54. You can also invest up to Rs 50 lakh in Capital Gains Bonds (Section 54EC) within 6 months of sale, with a 3-year lock-in.

Pre-sale property preparation. Buyers inspect properties before committing. A flat that needs painting, minor repairs, or cleaning is harder to sell at the desired price. Sellers who invest Rs 30,000-80,000 in preparing a property often recover that amount many times over in better negotiation outcomes.

Broker commission. Standard brokerage for residential property in most Indian cities is 1-2% of the transaction value on the seller’s side. For a Rs 1 crore property, this is Rs 1-2 lakh. This is negotiable, particularly when the same broker handles both buy and sell sides.

Foreclosure charges. If the property being sold has an outstanding home loan, it must be closed before transfer. Foreclosure charges are typically 0-2% of the outstanding principal. Most banks have moved to zero foreclosure charges on floating rate loans following RBI directives. Fixed rate loans and NBFCs may still charge. Verify with your lender before planning the transaction.

Is property a significant part of your retirement plan?

A RetireWise retirement plan accounts for the full value, cost, and liquidity profile of your property assets as part of your overall retirement corpus.

Book a Free 30-Min Call

When Buying: The Costs on the Buyer’s Side

Stamp duty and registration. Typically the largest transaction cost on the buyer’s side. Rates vary by state: Maharashtra 5-6%, Karnataka 5-5.6%, Delhi 4-6%, Rajasthan 5-6%. Registration charges are typically an additional 1%. For a Rs 1 crore property in most states, expect Rs 6-7 lakh in stamp duty and registration alone.

GST on under-construction property. GST at 5% (without input tax credit) or 1% (for affordable housing under Rs 45 lakh) applies on the agreement value. Development charges, map approval charges, and occupancy certificate costs vary by builder and local authority.

Loan processing and bank charges. Home loan processing fees are typically 0.5-1% of the loan amount. For a Rs 75 lakh loan, this is Rs 37,500-75,000. Additionally: property valuation fee (Rs 3,000-10,000), legal vetting of documents, technical assessment fee. Some banks bundle these; others charge separately.

Mortgage insurance. Many lenders push mortgage reduction insurance at loan disbursement. A separate term insurance policy equal to the loan amount is almost always a better and cheaper option. The bundled bank insurance covers the declining loan balance; a standalone term policy covers your full life. Do not accept the bank’s bundled insurance without comparing with a standalone term policy first.

Society charges. For a resale apartment: society transfer charges, maintenance deposit, parking (Rs 2-10 lakh as a lump sum in many urban societies), parking maintenance charges. These vary enormously by society and location.

Moving and settling costs. Movers and packers, utility security deposits (electricity, gas), new connections. For a mid-size flat in a tier-1 city, budget Rs 50,000-1.5 lakh for this category.

Immediate renovation costs. Most buyers underestimate what they will spend before moving in: paint, flooring, light fixtures, curtains, kitchen modifications, bathroom upgrades. Budget realistically for what you actually plan to do, not the minimum you hope to get away with.

“The client who came to me in a panic had planned for the property price difference. He had not planned for the 10% in transaction costs on top of it. This is not a rare mistake. It is the most common property planning mistake I see.”

– Hemant Beniwal, CFP, CTEP | Founder, RetireWise

Read – 8 Ways a Smaller House Saves You Money and Builds Retirement Wealth

Read – Why Fixed Deposit Returns Are Always Negative in Real Terms (2026 Update)

Frequently Asked Questions

How has the 2024 Budget change on capital gains tax affected property sellers?

Budget 2024 changed property LTCG from 20% with indexation to 12.5% without indexation, effective July 23, 2024. The holding period for long-term status was also reduced from 36 to 24 months. For properties purchased before July 23, 2024, there may be a grandfathering option allowing comparison of old versus new method. The impact varies significantly by property: older properties in high-inflation periods often had large indexation benefits, making the old method more favourable. Newer properties may pay less under the flat 12.5% rate. Calculate both and verify with a tax professional before transacting.

Is broker commission mandatory? Can I negotiate?

Broker commission is entirely negotiable. There is no statutory rate. The “standard” 1-2% per side is a convention, not a rule. When one broker handles both buyer and seller, negotiate for a combined rate of 1.5-2% rather than 2-4% total. In a buyer’s market or for properties that take time to sell, brokers are more willing to negotiate. Always fix the commission in writing before engaging a broker.

Can I save stamp duty by showing a lower transaction price?

Stamp duty is calculated on the higher of the actual transaction price or the government circle rate (jantri/ready reckoner rate). If you declare a lower value than the circle rate, stamp duty is still calculated on the circle rate. Under-declaration also creates income tax complications for both buyer and seller under Section 50C and Section 56(2)(x). The risks of under-declaration significantly outweigh the apparent savings, particularly given increased scrutiny by tax authorities of property transactions.

The biggest financial mistakes in property transactions happen not from bad negotiation on the price, but from failing to account for the 8-12% of additional costs that make the actual transaction significantly more expensive than the headline number. Plan for the full cost. Not the aspirational cost.

Know the full price before you sign. The hidden costs are hidden only until they arrive.

How does property fit into your overall retirement plan?

RetireWise builds retirement plans that account for your full net worth including property equity, outstanding loans, and the capital tied up in real estate.

See Our Retirement Planning Service

💬 Your Turn

What was the most unexpected cost you encountered in a property transaction? Was it factored into your original plan? Share in the comments.

Behave Yourself Financially: 5 Patterns That Cost Indian Investors the Most

Hemant Beniwal
-
5
Behave Yourself Financially: 5 Patterns That Cost Indian Investors the Most

“Investing is not a game where the guy with the 160 IQ beats the guy with the 130 IQ. Once you have ordinary intelligence, what you need is the temperament to control the urges that get other people into trouble in investing.” – Warren Buffett

Our entire childhood went hearing one phrase from parents and elders: “Behave yourself.”

Thanks to that phrase, most of the manners and emotions we display in public are shaped by our desire to appear composed and appropriate. Behaviour controls our responses, our emotions, and our overall personality.

Now imagine your financial planner calling and saying the same thing: “Behave yourself.”

In 25 years of advising, I have seen four clients whose financial outcomes were determined almost entirely by their behaviour, not their knowledge or their income. Let me share their stories.

⚡ Quick Answer

The five behavioural mistakes that cost Indian investors the most are: overconfidence in their own predictions, herd mentality (doing what others do), fear of change (staying in underperforming investments), fear of action (paralysis under uncertainty), and information overload (too many signals, no clear decision). The DALBAR behaviour gap shows that investors earn 3-4% less annually than their own funds because of these patterns. On a Rs 50 lakh corpus over 20 years, that gap compounds to Rs 1.2-1.5 crore.

Behave yourself financially - investor behaviour mistakes India

Four Clients. Four Behaviour Patterns. Four Outcomes.

Mr Mudgal sold all his stocks – including blue-chip stocks he had bought just a week earlier – on hearing news of artillery firing between North and South Korea. The conflict was real. The threat to his Infosys and HDFC Bank holdings was not. He sold in panic and missed the subsequent recovery entirely.

Mr Ravi was a heart patient who invested his entire emergency fund into a sector-specific fund, even though his advisor had specifically recommended a systematic investment plan rather than a lump sum. He knew his own health situation. He understood the risk of concentrating capital. He did it anyway.

Mr Gautam did not sell his stock holdings three months before his daughter’s wedding, even when the markets had peaked and he needed the money. His answer to me was one of the most profound things I have heard: “Not taking a decision to sell is also a decision.” He was right. It was the wrong decision.

Mr Paswan shifted all his mutual fund investments to a liquid fund and stopped his SIPs in March 2009 – one of the best months in the last 20 years to stay invested. Three months later, the Sensex had recovered 40%. He came back to equity at 40% higher prices.

These are not unusual cases. In 25 years, I have seen versions of each of these stories dozens of times. The instrument was different. The outcome was the same.

The Five Financial Behaviour Patterns That Cost You Money

1. Overconfidence

Ask most men who manages money better – men or women. Most men will answer in their own favour. That is overconfidence. The same pattern applies to market predictions and investment decisions.

The Dunning-Kruger effect describes what happens when someone lacks the competence to recognise their own incompetence. In investing, it shows up as “I knew this stock would recover” from someone who has never looked at a balance sheet. Or “I always buy at the right time” from someone whose portfolio tells a different story.

People in their middle years are most affected by this pattern. They have enough investing experience to feel confident but not enough to understand what they do not know. The SEBI Investor Survey 2022 found that retail investors consistently overestimate their own performance relative to benchmarks.

2. Herd Mentality

“My boss is very good with money. He drives a BMW. I should invest where he invests.”

This is one of the most common patterns I see. The subordinate fails to understand that two individuals with different goals, income levels, tax brackets, risk tolerance, and time horizons cannot share the same investment strategy. What works for the boss at 52 is not what works for you at 34.

Herd mentality also explains why money flows into equity funds at market peaks and leaves at market bottoms. When everyone around you is making money in stocks, staying out feels foolish. When everyone is exiting, staying in feels reckless. The crowd is almost always wrong at the extremes.

Read: Herd Mentality in Investing: If 10 Crore People Say Something Foolish, It Is Still Foolish

3. Fear of Change

These investors are captured by their own past. They have a very negative view of anything new. They believe markets are moving towards disaster and any change in momentum means capital loss. They forget that markets do not guarantee returns or capital in either direction.

The irony: their fear of market volatility pushes them entirely into fixed deposits and savings accounts. The result is not safety. It is a portfolio that earns 6-7% while inflation in healthcare and education runs at 8-10%. They do not lose money in nominal terms. They lose purchasing power in real terms. That is a slower, quieter kind of loss – and a very real one.

4. Fear of Action

These investors have made bad decisions before and concluded that non-action is the safest action. They wait for others to convince them so that if things go wrong, the blame can be shared. They never own their decisions fully.

The consequence: investments stay in the wrong instruments for years. A bad ULIP bought in 2008 is still sitting in the portfolio in 2026 because “deciding to exit is also a decision.” It is. And so is staying.

5. Information Overload

When you have too many options and too many inputs, you either make the wrong decision or postpone the decision entirely. In investing, postponement is rarely neutral. Every month of delay in starting a SIP has a compounding cost. Every quarter of sitting on cash while “waiting for clarity” is a quarter of returns foregone.

The solution is not more information. It is a clear framework that reduces the number of decisions you need to make. Automate what can be automated. Delegate what requires expertise you do not have.

The DALBAR Behaviour Gap: What These Patterns Actually Cost

DALBAR’s annual Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behaviour tracks the gap between what funds return and what investors actually earn. The gap is consistently 3-4% per year – not because the funds underperformed, but because investors bought high, sold low, switched at the wrong time, and stopped SIPs during corrections. Over 20 years, on a Rs 50 lakh corpus, a 3% annual behaviour gap translates to Rs 1.2-1.5 crore of lost wealth. That is not a rounding error. That is a retirement corpus.

SEBI data from 2025 showed that during the January 2025 correction, SIP stoppage ratios spiked significantly – precisely when staying invested would have produced the best subsequent returns. The behaviour gap is not historical. It is happening right now.

What You Can Do Instead

Buffett’s point about temperament over IQ is not just a nice quote. It is the most operationally useful insight in investing.

You cannot fully eliminate behavioural biases. They are wired into how the human brain processes risk and uncertainty. What you can do is build a system that reduces the number of decisions that are vulnerable to those biases. Automate your SIPs so the decision to invest is not made monthly. Set a written asset allocation so the decision to rebalance is rule-based, not emotional. Work with an advisor who has seen enough market cycles to provide context when your instincts are screaming the wrong thing.

The two practical tools that work for most investors are diversification and asset allocation. Not because they eliminate risk, but because they reduce the number of high-stakes decisions you face during moments of panic.

Read: The Art of Thinking Clearly in Personal Finance

Investing is not a Numbers Game. It is a Mind Game.

A retirement plan built without accounting for your own behaviour is a plan that will break at the worst possible moment. RetireWise builds behavioural guardrails into every plan.

See How RetireWise Manages Investor Behaviour

Mr Paswan stopped his SIPs at the exact bottom of the 2009 market. He knew the theory. He read the research. He still sold. Knowledge is not the problem. Behaviour is the problem.

Do the right thing. Sit tight.

Which of the five patterns do you recognise in yourself?

Recognising the pattern is the first step. A structured plan with a professional who holds you accountable is the second.

Book a Free 30-Min Call

Your Turn

Which of the five behaviour patterns has cost you the most money? And what did you learn from it? Share in the comments – these real stories help more people than any theory.

1...454647...51Page 46 of 51