5 Insurance Policies You Probably Don’t Need – And One You Must Never Drop

28

Last Updated on April 21, 2026 by teamtfl

“Insurance is not about getting the best deal. It is about having the right cover at the right time – and letting go of what no longer serves you.”

A client walked into my office a few years ago carrying a folder thick enough to be mistaken for a legal brief. Inside: eleven insurance policies. Term plans, endowment policies, ULIPs, a money-back plan, two health policies, a personal accident rider, and something his banker had sold him as “a guaranteed savings plan with life cover.”

He was paying Rs 1.8 lakh per year in premiums. Of that, Rs 1.1 lakh – more than 60% – was going to policies he did not need, did not understand, or that were actively working against his retirement goals.

Eleven policies. And his family was actually underinsured on the things that mattered.

⚡ Quick Answer

Insure things where the financial impact of loss is catastrophic and you cannot self-fund: term insurance, health insurance, critical illness. Skip or exit policies where the premium serves the seller more than you: investment-linked insurance, child plans, redundant death riders, bank-sold home loan protection plans. As you approach retirement, review every life insurance policy – several may have outlived their purpose, and freeing those premiums is one of the highest-return decisions you can make.

5 insurance policies you may not need - how to rationalise your insurance portfolio

The Framework: How to Think About Any Insurance Decision

Two questions determine whether insurance is worth buying: what is the probability of the event occurring, and what is the financial impact if it does?

High probability, high financial impact (health emergencies, motor accidents): insure without question. Low probability, high financial impact (premature death when you have young dependents, critical illness): insure after evaluating your situation. High probability, low financial impact (phone screen cracks, extended warranties): self-fund. Low probability, low financial impact (credit card loss, flight delays): ignore entirely.

Most insurance mis-selling happens in the bottom two quadrants. Products are dressed up to appear high-impact when they are not. The premium flows to the seller. You get cover for something that was never a real financial threat.

“In 25 years of reviewing client portfolios, I have never met anyone underinsured on things that did not matter. But I regularly meet people paying thousands per year on wrong policies while being underinsured on term and health.”

– Hemant Beniwal, CFP, CTEP | Founder, RetireWise

Policy 1: Insurance Mixed With Investment

This is the single most pervasive insurance mistake in India – and it costs families crores over a lifetime.

ULIPs, endowment plans, money-back policies, guaranteed return plans with life cover – all mix insurance and investment in a way that does neither well. The insurance component is expensive: a pure term plan gives 5-10x more cover for the same or less premium. The investment component is expensive: fund charges, mortality charges, and premium allocation charges reduce your effective returns significantly versus a mutual fund.

The product is structured this way because it generates far higher commissions for the seller. Your banker recommends it because the branch has insurance sales targets. Your agent recommends it because the first-year commission runs 25-35%.

What to do: Buy a term plan for life cover. Invest in mutual funds for wealth creation. Keep them separate. If you have an existing endowment or ULIP, evaluate whether surrendering makes sense after accounting for surrender charges. Here is a guide to exiting mis-sold insurance policies.

Policy 2: Life Insurance on a Child’s Name

The purpose of life insurance is to replace income that dependents will lose if the insured person dies. A child has no income. There is nothing to replace.

Child insurance plans – marketed as “securing your child’s future” – are typically endowment or ULIP structures on the child’s name. They are a marketing construct, not a financial solution. If you want to secure your child’s future, insure your own life adequately and invest separately for their education goals.

What to do: Large enough term insurance on your life plus dedicated SIPs for your child’s goals is the correct structure. Nothing else is needed.

Policy 3: Life Insurance After Retirement

This is the retirement angle that most insurance discussions completely miss.

Life insurance protects your dependents from the financial loss of your income. Once you retire, there is no active income to replace. If your children are earning, your home loan is cleared, and your spouse has her own income or pension – life insurance after 60 is, for most people, serving no real financial purpose. You are paying premiums to leave a legacy, not to protect a livelihood.

The exception: if your spouse depends entirely on your pension (which stops when you pass), or if you have outstanding liabilities. In those cases, some cover is warranted. Otherwise, freeing up Rs 30,000-80,000 per year in premiums and redirecting that to your retirement corpus for another 5-7 years is a meaningful decision.

What to do: At age 55-60, review every life policy. For each one ask: whose income am I protecting, and does that person still depend on my income? If the answer is no, plan a systematic exit.

When did you last review whether each policy still serves its purpose?

An insurance audit is part of every RetireWise retirement plan – identifying what to keep, what to exit, and how to redirect freed premiums.

Book a Free 30-Min Call

Policy 4: Accidental Death Rider When You Already Have Term

Accidental death insurance is largely redundant if you already have adequate term life insurance. Term insurance pays on death from any cause – accident, illness, or otherwise. Adding a separate accidental death policy means paying twice to protect against the same financial loss.

Where personal accident insurance adds genuine value: disability and income replacement cover. If an accident leaves you unable to work, term insurance does not pay because you are alive. A disability income rider or standalone personal accident policy covering loss of income from disability fills a real gap that is significantly underutilised in India.

What to do: If your personal accident policy covers only death and you have adequate term cover, it is likely redundant. If it covers disability and income replacement, it earns its premium.

Policy 5: Home Loan Protection Insurance Sold by Your Bank

When you take a home loan, your bank will almost certainly try to sell you a home loan protection plan – often presenting it as compulsory or strongly recommended. It is neither.

These plans are typically single-premium policies where cover reduces as your loan balance reduces. They are significantly more expensive than a plain term plan providing equivalent cover. They also lock you into the lender in a way that complicates refinancing to a better rate later.

The right solution: your existing term insurance (sized correctly) already covers your family’s ability to repay the home loan if you die. There is no need for a separate, expensive, loan-linked policy. More on why home loan protection insurance is usually a bad deal.

The Sunk Cost Trap in Insurance

The most common reason people keep paying for policies they should exit: “I have already paid so much, I cannot stop now.” This is the sunk cost fallacy. The premiums you have already paid are gone – irrelevant to whether you should continue. The only relevant question: does continuing this policy justify the ongoing premium? If the answer is no, exit – even if you have been paying for 12 years. Every year you keep a wrong policy is a year that money could have been compounding in your retirement corpus.

A policy kept out of guilt is not protecting you. It is just costing you.

The One Insurance You Must Never Drop: Health

Everything above is about rationalising. This is about holding firm.

Health insurance becomes more expensive and harder to obtain after 60. Pre-existing conditions create waiting periods. Many insurers limit or decline cover above certain ages. The medical costs of ageing are significant and inflation-linked at 12-15% annually.

Buy comprehensive personal health insurance in your 40s. Maintain it continuously through retirement. Never depend solely on an employer group policy that stops the day you retire. Never lapse a health policy and try to restart it – the underwriting at re-entry is far more stringent than at original entry.

Read – Critical Illness Insurance: Why Your Health Insurance Is Not Enough

Read – How Much Health Insurance Do I Need in India?

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I surrender my LIC endowment policy?

It depends on how many years you have paid and how many remain. In the early years (under 5), surrender charges are high and the case for exiting is strongest. After 15+ years on a 20-year policy, you may be close enough to maturity that surrendering costs more than waiting. Always model the numbers for your specific policy rather than applying a general rule.

At what age should I stop paying for life insurance?

Once your retirement corpus can sustain your spouse without your income, and your children are financially independent, the primary purpose of life insurance is fulfilled. For most people this happens between 55 and 65. At that point, making policies paid-up or letting them lapse is usually the right approach.

Is health insurance still needed after retirement?

Always. Buy personal family floater health insurance in your 40s, keep it running through retirement, and review the sum insured every few years to keep pace with medical inflation running at 12-15% annually.

More insurance is not better insurance. The right insurance is. And in retirement, much of what you paid for in your 30s and 40s has done its job. Releasing those premiums and redirecting them – even for 5-7 years – adds meaningfully to your corpus.

Review, rationalise, redirect. That is the insurance strategy for retirement.

Want a complete insurance audit as part of your retirement plan?

RetireWise reviews every policy you hold – what to keep, what to exit, and how to redirect freed premiums into your corpus.

See Our Retirement Planning Service

💬 Your Turn

Have you ever done a full audit of your insurance policies? What did you find – and what did you decide to exit? Share in the comments.

28 COMMENTS

  1. We as a family members read your articles. Really following most of them and experiencing too.

    thanks for that.

    One thing noticed that you comments on LIC is more with respect to insurance than any private players, since we have been reading in the dailies about the private insurance rejections and their settlements on claims etc. Why it is so? since we have more LIC policies, at times worried whether we did a mistake.

  2. Dear Shailesh Bhuskute,

    Reading your comment, I had a slight feeling that the Health Assure plan that you are having needs to be reviewed!
    If that’s from a Life Insurance Company, I am sure somebody met their target by you! And if its from a General Insurance Company, the “probability” of having the right product can be as high as 100%. I am sure you know probability is not surety! However, its recommended to review once.

    Optima Restore is a very good option- Never heard any bad report thus far.

    Thank you.

  3. Dear HEMANT
    I completely agree with you bcos till now many people think life insurance as the best saving scheme for future planning as they get a big lump sum after 10 yrs or 15 yrs or even more. But they dont think about the value of that money at that time. this is only bcos they think life insurance as the most reliable thing.
    After all a very good blog and hope people will make out the things clearer after reading this blog.

  4. Hi Hemant,

    I dont feel Term Plan is waste of money. As you are mentioning it comes under High Risk & Financial Impact is also high on your family (if you are the only earning member) In that case every one should go for a plain term plan without any rider.

    Please correct me if I am wrong.

    • Rahul,

      Term plan is surely the ideal means and you are right in saying that one should go for a plain term plan when looking for a family protection. But cost do also matter and when you have so many options available then its wiser to go for one which gives you lower payout.

  5. Even the returns on a fixed deposit are better. Mutual funds fer more superior. Pure vanilla products as Hemant bhai are far the best when it comes to insurance.

  6. Hi Hemant,

    I am reader of your posts, not regular though. Somewhere in past, I read that we can paid up our LIC policies. My practical problem is below:
    We have 4 Jeevan Saral policies taken 2 years back and just few months are remaining to complete 3 paid years. I want these policies to be cancelled as I have taken a Term Insurance. I approached LIC and they said that I will get nothing if I cancell those immediately however in case if I cancel those after completion of 3 years, I would get some amount i.e. 30%-35% of paid amount.
    Kindly advise the sensible step should i take.

    Thanks,
    Rakesh Rege

    • Hi Rakesh,

      Paid up is a viable option in a traditional insurance plans. But it is applicable only when you have paid three years premium. As far as withdrawing a policy is concerned, if you surrender it then you have to forego first year premium and then you receive approx 30% of the remaining premiums. Before three years are completed if you withdraw then you loose what you have paid. Whether to pay third year premiums, for this you need to analyse the opportunity loss and the impact on your expenses from the premium you are paying.

  7. Dear Hemant

    Can you please share your personal expertise on BHAGYA UDAY – LIC PACKAGE. was thinking to invest in this scheme considering getting returns for whole life.

    Your veiws please.

    thank you for your wonderful guidance and support.

    best regards

  8. Instead of money back policy, I personally think pure term insurance is better. I think you might agree with me that we should think why are we taking the insurance ?. Which goal are we going to achieve ?

    • I’m a bit confused on how term insurance is being sold at strikingly different premiums.I noticed in some cases, the premium is almost half of its competitors !!. To quote an example, a reputed insurance company offers Term insurance with a single premium payment facility of covering life for 1 Crore for just about 4 Lakhs. I’m not able to understand how are they able to do this. Its difficult to assess what we buy. Unlike a product purchase, where I can easily evaluate its woth either pre purchase thro enquiries or post purchuse through usage, in cases of term insurance, one doesn’t really get to know if the claim will be met. Requesting Hemant to throw some light on this.

      • The trouble with ‘Money back ‘policy is that we are financially speaking -‘Na idhar ke na udhar ke. Neither insurance neither investment. Also please consider single premium Vs paying premium every year.Ask yourself this question that why are you taking this policy for ?

        • Also please consider inflation. In fact when I debated this issue with Kotak Life Insurance – they had no answer to my query that they have not inbuild inflation into their magnificent policy.

    • Hi Swapnil,

      Its a bundled product where Life insurance coverage has conditions attached to it. Wiser to invest in SIP for long term investment than for life insurance coverage.

  9. Hello Hemant,

    Very good advise. I wish I was 20 years younger today to capture all the benefits it could yield now,should the advise was given to me 20 years back even at a cost. Anyway I have told many youngsters about your site and advises provided by you when they come to me.Also I would like to know about category of House/theft/burglery and Loan insurance?

    Thanks

  10. Hi Hemant!
    Very apt advice. But it does not answer my Doubts. I am aware about all the facts you mentioned as i have worked in Insurance sector for 2 years in Underwriting. but confused for myself, which plan to buy. My purpose is just to cover mine and my Husbands life as we have a home loan running behind us. And for term plans , i think they are a waste of money, and for ULIPs i am totally aware about the charges, hence not intrested in them.. My objective is pure insurance , thats y i was thinking to go for Endowmnet plans. I know if objective is Only insurance then Term is better, but still i am not in favour of Term.

    • Dear Namrata,

      Why do you think term plans are waste of money? How much insurance through Endowment do you have? Please check the premium for similar amount in term insurance. Then subtract that amount from your current endowment premium. Check the return at fixed deposit rates for the residual amount. Am sure this calculation will put things in perspective.

      Regards
      Pankaj

  11. Good Article. I have an experience. I have a credit card which has offerred Health Insurance. As mentioned in the article, they said “especially available for our card holders”. I was forcibly committed to have the policy. The next day I have checked the health insurance from the same insurance company having same conditions with which the credit card is having tie-up. To my surprise there is lot of difference. The credit card offerred the insurance at Rs.29,500/- and the same I got from the Insurance company at Rs. 8,500/-. I have cancelled the health Insurance offerred by the Credit card and I have taken the same with the Insurance company directly.

  12. dear hemant
    as usual a good posting with apt advices.
    .i feel most of the things covered are done by me without thinking too much.any way thanks for the post and expecting more apt advises.
    drteny

Leave a Reply to brunetta Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here